Moody’s Is Concerned About “Concentrated Risk” When Using Blockchain
Yes, you heard that correctly. Moody’s angle is not that blockchain technology is displacing and disrupting archaic financial systems. Instead, they argue that its application is risky:
“New key transaction parties will be introduced to the process, namely the entities that serve as developer, provider, and operator of a blockchain. They may be either closely linked or identical with the originator, or independent third-party service providers, which could lead to a certain degree of counterparty concentration risk. [This] may also assume a systemic component.”
No System Is More Concentrated Than The World’s Reliance on the U.S. Dollar
This argument has always been out there and it’s frustrating, to put it mildly. To dissuade someone from doing something, fear is an excellent deterrent. Another good tactic is to take the biggest problem with your system and claim that it’s the biggest issue with the usurper. Conventional finance is so overwhelmingly reliant on the US Dollar and the Federal Reserve that any criticism of something else for being “concentrated” is the ultimate hypocritical situation. The blockchain is the target in this scenario.
Bitcoin and many of its peers utilize a vast and complex network. Many of the most exceptional engineers in the world build and maintain them. The way Moody’s writes about it, you would think it was four men and a dog in a shed. If one calls in sick, then the whole system collapses!
Banks Are Resistant to Change
As ever, the issue here is that banks have resisted change for a long time and it’s expensive and time-consuming to shift to a more efficient platform. Moody’s is not exactly known for getting it right all the time. The salvaging of their reputation after the sub-prime mortgage crisis bears a resemblance to Lazarus emerging from his tomb. All a rating agency has to be is honest and thorough. Most of the big ones failed the test in 2008.
Bitcoin’s Rules Are Inherent in the System
So should the Moody’s report be taken seriously? Absolutely. It should be a reminder that engineers and strategists for blockchain projects have to hold themselves to a higher standard. The old guard is always desperate to see an upstart fail.
Take this final quote from Moody’s
“Someone has to define the rules and also has to monitor the application of the rules.”
This could apply to anything. Blockchain isn’t magic, but the implantation of the consensus algorithm might as well be when judged against the tired old systems that finance runs on today.
The average lifespan of a fiat currency is 27 years before it implodes. Individual leaders and not people vote for central bankers who set the tone for the entire financial system. If that’s not a systemic risk, I’m not sure what is.
About The Author
Financial speculator living in the hills in Los Angeles. J.D. but very much not a lawyer. Favorite trading books are anything written by Jack Schwager.